For the last 47 years, year in and year out, the voting rights act vra has stood as our. Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws. Congress must act quickly to restore the voting rights act. While section 5 of the voting rights act still remains in force, the supreme courts new decision. The voting rights act vra was passed in 1965 to ensure that state and local governments do not deny american citizens the equal right to vote based on their race, color, or membership in a minority language group.
Back then, he led the effort to narrow the landmark 1965 voting rights act. Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices. Jul 28, 2017 the voting rights act had not included a provision prohibiting poll taxes, but had directed the attorney general to challenge its use. Everything thats happened since supreme court ruled on. The voting rights act after the supreme courts decision in shelby county subcommittee on the constitution and civil justice committee on the judiciary thursday, july 18, 20 10. Since 1965, the voting rights act vra has protected minority voters at the polls. Does brett kavanaugh spell the end of voting rights. The supreme court has issued a ruling in a key voting rights case regarding the voting rights act and continued federal oversight of elections in states with a past history of discrimination. The voting rights act is in jeopardy, but it shouldnt be american. Supreme courts voting rights act decision annotated. The voting rights act after the supreme court s decision in shelby county subcommittee on the constitution and civil justice committee on the judiciary thursday, july 18, 20 10. The supreme courts ruling and the end of the civil rights era.
The supreme courts recent decision in shelby county v. Supreme court invalidates key section of voting rights act. Examining voting in the wake of shelby county trinity college. List of landmark court decisions in the united states wikipedia. And the court responded by desegregating public schools, upholding the constitutionality of the voting rights act and legalizing interracial marriage, to name a few landmark decisions. Supreme court strikes down key provision in voting rights act. Fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments reflects a decision to give congress. However, i have a strongly negative reaction to the exceedingly dated coverage formula adopted and consistently reauthorized for federal preclearance in the law.
This momentous piece of legislation enshrines the right of every citizen an equal opportunity to participate in our democracy. Congress enacted the voting rights act of 1965 to address entrenched racial. Supreme court of the united states brennan center for justice. The voting rights act ruling, preclearance, and michigan by glenn steffens, legislative analyst the u. California elections chief comments on voting rights ruling. The supreme court struck down section 4 of the voting rights act on tuesday, the provision of the landmark civil rights law that designates which parts of the country must have changes to their voting laws cleared by the federal government or in federal court.
The supreme court avoided ruling on this question in a 2009 case, but in that decision, chief justice john roberts seemed to suggest that the voting rights acts time may be coming to an end. And while todays decision is a setback, it doesnt represent the. Todays decision eliminates a critical level of protection for voters in states where governors and legislatures work year after year to undermine the. It suspends all changes to state election law however innocuousuntil they have been precleared by federal authorities in washington, d. This article is based on testimony given by the author before the u. By any measure, amendment 4s enfranchisement was historic. The supreme court gutted a key provision of the 1965 voting rights act on tuesday, ruling that the united states had sufficiently moved beyond its jim crow past and has rendered the laws. This paper assesses the supreme court decision in shelby county v. Based on this knowledge, they that the district cconclude ourts decision, if not reversed, will harm africanamerican voters and undermine this courts directive that the. The courts decision to hollow out the voting rights act of 1965, he says, eliminated an important weapon in the fight against discrimination, and local officials intent on diluting minority.
While the district court pre maturely invoked that exception in ordering extrarecord discovery here, it was ultimately justified in light of the expanded administrative record. Supreme court refuses to approve citizenship question on. How the supreme court is changing the rules on voting. The supreme courts ruling and the end of the civil rights era voting rights todays supreme court decision was monumental in that it essentially finds discrimination has all but disappeared. The supreme court on wednesday weighs the future of a key provision of the landmark voting rights act. Section 4b, at issue in the case, was part of a measure that. The state, long known for some of the more egregious civilrights abuses, had signed on to an amicus brief in support of the voting rights act filed with the supreme court. But, as the supreme court recognized, voting discrimination still exists. Lwv reacts to supreme court decision on the voting rights act.
Supreme court refuses to approve citizenship question on 2020. Holder 20 which invalidated the coverage formula of section 4 of the voting rights act of 1965. The supreme court struck down a key part of the landmark voting rights act supreme court halts use of key provision in landmark voting rights act. Indeed, roberts was invested in voting rights law as far back as 1982 when he was a staffer in the reagan administration. The voting rights act sharply departs from these basic principles. Washington the supreme court on tuesday effectively struck down the heart of the voting rights act of 1965 by a 5to4 vote, freeing nine states, mostly in the south, to change their election. Supreme court ruled that the voting rights act had achieved its main purpose shelby county v. Today, they dig into the courts 54 decision to invalidate significant parts of the voting rights act.
And 4 of the act applied that requirement only to some statesan equally. The voting rights act of 1965 employed extraordinary measures to address an extraordinary problem. When a state invokes the vra to justify racebased districting, it must show to meet the narrow tailoring requirement that it had good reasons for concluding that the statute required its action. The supreme court has upheld the acts preclearance provision four. Holder 20 that voided section 4 of the voting rights act which deprived section 5 of its enforcement powers. How will the supreme court affect voting in 2020 election. The paper presents an overview of conditions leading to the adoption of the voting rights act in 1965. The court held that congress had the power to enact the amendments that changed the voting age for federal elections, abolish literary tests at the polling station, and abolish state residency requirements for presidential and vice presidential election. Almost immediately after the supreme courts decision, states that had been. Ilya shapiro of the cato institute said that the supreme courts decision restored the. Supreme court struck down the coverage formula used for section 5 of the vra, which required jurisdictions with significant histories of voter discrimination to preclear any new voting practices or procedures, i. It was largely gutted by a supreme court decision in 20. Jun 26, 20 the state, long known for some of the more egregious civil rights abuses, had signed on to an amicus brief in support of the voting rights act filed with the supreme court.
Nov 21, 2018 the high courts decision repealed a voting rights act mandate that required jurisdictions where voter suppression has occurred in the past to preclear voting changes with the department of. List of landmark court decisions in the united states. Supreme court sacramento secretary of state debra bowen today issued the following statement regarding the u. With voting rights act out, states push voter id laws. Holder revolves around section 4 of the voting rights act, which establishes a coverage formula to determine which states and local governments fall under section 5, and therefore need to get approval before changing their voting laws. The voting rights act american civil liberties union.
Supreme court ends era of the voting rights act bloomberg. Carolyn kasterap once again, race is front and center at. Supreme court erased fundamental protections against racial discrimination in voting that have been effective for more than 40 years, said elisabeth macnamara. Supreme court recently made a landmark ruling in shelby county v holder 1, striking down a key section of the voting rights act vra2. The high courts decision repealed a voting rights act mandate that required jurisdictions where voter suppression has occurred in the past to preclear voting changes with the department of. Section 5 of the act required states to obtain federal permission before enacting any law related to votinga drastic departure from basic principles of federalism. In this article, we argue that the courts decision defied the def erential nature of. Archived from the original pdf on february 16, 2020.
Jul, 2018 and the court responded by desegregating public schools, upholding the constitutionality of the voting rights act and legalizing interracial marriage, to name a few landmark decisions. The voting rights act was designed to end discrimination against black americans, particularly those in the south after the civil war. A guide to the supreme court decision on the voting rights act. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader. Jun 27, 2019 the supreme court dealt a sharp and unexpected defeat to the trump administration on thursday, refusing to uphold its plan to ask all households about the citizenship of their residents as part of. Supreme court strikes down key part of voting rights act. On june 25, 20, the united states supreme court held that it is unconstitutional to use the coverage formula in section 4b of the voting rights act to determine which jurisdictions are subject to the preclearance requirement of section 5 of the voting rights act, shelby county v. Supreme court s federal voting rights act decision. The supreme court tuesday struck down a key part of the voting rights act, ruling unconstitutional a provision of the landmark civil rights legislation used. The ruling underscores the supreme courts lawmaking powers, challenging congress overwhelmingly bipartisan decision in 2006. Jun 25, 20 54 decision pdf today to kill a core part of the 1965 voting rights act eviscerates a landmark law that allowed millions of southern blacks to participate in democracy.
The voting rights act after the supreme courts decision. Testimony on the voting rights act after the supreme courts decision in shelby county by hans a. Ten important supreme court decisions in black history. House judiciary committees subcommittee on the constitution on july 18, 20. The supreme courts ruling and the end of the civil rights era voting rights todays supreme court decision was monumental in that it essentially finds. Voting rights battles head to supreme court the report.
Amendment 4 the single largest act of enfranchisement since the nineteenth amendment in 1920, the voting rights act in 1965, or the twentysixth amendment in 1971. Supreme courts decision on voting rights the washington. The supreme court dealt a sharp and unexpected defeat to the trump administration on thursday, refusing to uphold its plan to ask all households about the citizenship of their residents as part of. States must beseech the federal government for permission to implement laws that they would otherwise have the right to enact and execute. Nov 22, 2019 the voting rights act of 1965 is a key component of the civil rights movement that seeks to enforce the constitutions guarantee of every americans right to vote under the 15th amendment. Supreme court strikes down section of voting rights act. Washington the supreme courts decision tuesday striking down a key section of the 1965 voting rights act puts the nations strongest remedy against voting discrimination on life support. Those internet businesses believe a 1992 supreme court decision, quill corp. Chief justice roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Amendment 4 provided that a felons voting rights shall be restored upon. The voting rights act after the supreme courts decision in. Jul 18, 20 81983 pdf 20 voting rights act after the supreme courts decision in shelby county hearing before the subcommittee on the constitution and civil justice of the committee on the judiciary house of representatives one hundred thirteenth congress first session july 18, 20 serial no.
Jun 26, 20 washington the supreme court on tuesday effectively struck down the heart of the voting rights act of 1965 by a 5to4 vote, freeing nine states, mostly in the south, to change their election. The following is a partial list of landmark court decisions in the united. The voting rights act of 1965 vra is one of the most important, effective pieces. Source document contributed to documentcloud by news documents the new york times. The decision means that several states including alaska and arizona, where. Supreme court strikes down section 4 of the voting rights act.
Attorney general eric holder said the decision is a serious setback for voting rights. The supreme court struck down section 4 of the voting rights act in shelby county v. Supreme court invalidates key part of voting rights act the. Where it is feasible, a syllabus headnote will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. Testimony on the voting rights act after the supreme courts. I am deeply disappointed with the supreme courts decision today. Supreme court invalidates key part of voting rights act. In a 54 decision, the supreme court struck down a key provision of the voting rights act of 1965, stating that the legislation was based on now outdated data. Other parts of the voting law cannot totally fill the void left by. As to 11 of the districts, the court concluded that the voters had not shown, as this court s prece dent requires, that race was the predominant factor motivating the legislatures decision to place a significant number of voters within or without a particular district. Opinion does brett kavanaugh spell the end of voting rights. The shelby county supreme court majority finds the rational irrational. The supreme court continues to deliver an implicit message to civil rights advocates challenging election practices.
Specifically, the court overturned section 4 of the act, which laid out the formula for determining which states had to seek approval prior to enacting new voting laws. Should the voting rights act be overturned by the supreme. Voting rights act section 4 struck down by supreme court. What changes after supreme court ruling on voting rights act. Nov 01, 2012 the supreme court avoided ruling on this question in a 2009 case, but in that decision, chief justice john roberts seemed to suggest that the voting rights acts time may be coming to an end. Holder on tuesday, invalidating a key section of the voting rights act of 1965 by a 54 vote, the justices held that section 4 was based on an outdated formula that does not reflect current attitudes about racial discrimination.
56 72 933 1042 173 695 613 1444 1447 1383 1040 579 66 873 591 1496 844 227 387 1371 1065 674 1540 1376 470 1362 907 460 542 1095